SFX Entertainment, INC SFXE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1553588Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2013 to Nov 2016
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- King & WoodFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Robinson BrogFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- DORNBUSH SCHAEFFER STRONGIN & VENAGLIAFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.88 |
| King & Wood | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Robinson Brog | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 27 | 1.86 | 0.72 | 2.30 |
| DLA Piper | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| DORNBUSH SCHAEFFER STRONGIN & VENAGLIA | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 6 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
| Foley & Lardner | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Littman Krooks | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Colin J. DiamondWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Aron IzowerReed SmithFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Mitchell LampertRobinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Herbert F. KozlovReed SmithFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jonathan KleinDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin J. DiamondWhite & Case | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Aron IzowerReed Smith | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 2.15 | 1.47 | 1.85 |
| Mitchell LampertRobinson & Cole LLP | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 15 | 0.91 | 1.52 | 1.48 |
| Herbert F. KozlovReed Smith | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 15 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Jonathan KleinDLA Piper | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |