Seadrill Partners LLC SDLP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1553467Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2014 to Sep 2019
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.37 |
| Allen & Gledhill | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Allen & Overy | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine S. GallagherVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Daniel C. RodgersWatson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine S. GallagherVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 59 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Daniel C. RodgersWatson Farley & Williams | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 |