ViSalus, Inc.
CIK 1552860Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Finn Dixon & HerlingFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 2.15×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 0.96 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.19 |
| Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 223 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Finn Dixon & Herling | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 28 | 1.29 | 0.76 | 2.15 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.52 |