TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC. TTSH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1552800Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jul 2013 to Nov 2019
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in a filing · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in a filing | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 1.07 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Angela GomesSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Richard SegalCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Paul D. BroudeFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Alexander RosensteinFredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked May 2013 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angela GomesSullivan & Worcester LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in a filing | 85 | 0.88 | 1.89 | 1.25 |
| Richard SegalCooley LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Paul D. BroudeFoley & Lardner | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.30 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| Alexander RosensteinFredrikson & Byron, P.A. | May 2013 | Text search only | 9 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & Emery | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 25 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 2.09 |