Amira Nature Foods Ltd. ANFI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1552448Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2014 to May 2020
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Hamilton & Associates Law GroupFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Hamilton & Associates Law Group | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.34 | 1.72 | 1.69 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Timothy CruickshankKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Brenda HamiltonHamilton & Associates Law GroupFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 2.36× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- John G. CrowleyDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- JOSEPH F. DANIELSLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timothy CruickshankKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Brenda HamiltonHamilton & Associates Law Group | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.81 | 2.36 | 1.39 |
| John G. CrowleyDavis Polk | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| JOSEPH F. DANIELSLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 1.46 |