TransUnion TRU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1552033Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Neal Gerber & EisenbergFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Neal Gerber & Eisenberg | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 56 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lillian BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.57×
- Michael A. PuckerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.74×
- Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- John D. AmorosiDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lillian BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.57 |
| Michael A. PuckerLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.74 |
| Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| John D. AmorosiDavis Polk | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 17 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |