Progyny, Inc. PGNY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1551306Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Feb 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2024 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Alison HaggertyCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Danielle E. NaftulinCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Mark B. WeeksCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Nicole BrookshireCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Feb 2024 | Named in a filing | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Alison HaggertyCooley LLP | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Danielle E. NaftulinCooley LLP | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Mark B. WeeksCooley LLP | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
| Nicole BrookshireCooley LLP | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.73 |