Eaton Corp plc ETN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1551182Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McCann FitzGeraldFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- White & CaseFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in a filing · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Bartlett LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Benesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McCann FitzGerald | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| White & Case | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Sep 2017 | Named in a filing | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Bartlett LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 55 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| Linklaters LLP | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| A&L Goodbody | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Arthur Cox | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel NamWhite & CaseFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jessica Y. ChenWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Gary A. BrooksCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 6.74× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Charles I. CogutSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel NamWhite & Case | Aug 2024 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jessica Y. ChenWhite & Case | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Gary A. BrooksCahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.90 | 6.74 | 1.39 |
| Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 39 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Charles I. CogutSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 15 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 23 | 2.60 | 1.10 | 1.22 |