Performant Healthcare Inc PHLT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1550695Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Mar 2013 to Jul 2020
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.23 |
| Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 223 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blair W. WhitePillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- David E. LillevandPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blair W. WhitePillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| David E. LillevandPillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.73 |