Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. SAMG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1549966Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael L. StevensAlston & BirdFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Matthew W. MamakAlston & BirdFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Floyd I. WittlinBingham McCutchenFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Christina MelendiBingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael L. StevensAlston & Bird | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.84 | 1.43 | 0.98 |
| Matthew W. MamakAlston & Bird | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Floyd I. WittlinBingham McCutchen | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 1.18 |
| Christina MelendiBingham McCutchen | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 |