XURA, INC. MESG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1549872Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| DLA Piper | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel ClivnerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Rod MillerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel ClivnerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.01 |
| Rod MillerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 22 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.14 |