Hi-Crush Inc. HCR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1549848Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jul 2014 to May 2019
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stevens & Lee | Oct 2013 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Norton Rose | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian P. FenskeNorton RoseFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Charles L. StraussFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.66×
- David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian P. FenskeNorton Rose | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Charles L. StraussFulbright & Jaworski | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 2.66 |
| David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 78 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 52 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 2.06 |