QGOG Constellation S.A.
CIK 1548086Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Norton Rose | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Donald BakerWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark O. BagnallWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald BakerWhite & Case | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark O. BagnallWhite & Case | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & Plimpton | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 13 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.65 |