TAMINCO Corp TAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1547063Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.86 |