Edwards Group Ltd EVAC_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1544175Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- CMS Cameron McKennaFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | May 2012 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| CMS Cameron McKenna | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 32 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 1.45 |