Dynacast International Inc.
CIK 1540563Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Mayer Brown | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles A. SamuelsonHughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Daniel G. BerickSquire Sanders (US)First linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Douglas S. HorowitzCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Elizabeth G. WrenKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.55×
- James B. CarlsonMayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kenneth A. LefkowitzHughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Stephen SalmonDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles A. SamuelsonHughes Hubbard & Reed | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| Daniel G. BerickSquire Sanders (US) | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Douglas S. HorowitzCahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Elizabeth G. WrenKilpatrick Stockton | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 13 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 3.55 |
| James B. CarlsonMayer Brown | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 18 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kenneth A. LefkowitzHughes Hubbard & Reed | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 24 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Stephen SalmonDavis Polk | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 26 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.47 |