Diamondback Energy, Inc. FANG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1539838Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Balch & BinghamFirst linked Jul 2019 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.First linked May 2012 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked May 2012 · Text search only · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Balch & Bingham | Jul 2019 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.59 | 0.55 | 1.12 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Akin Gump | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. | May 2012 | Text search only | 27 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.07 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | May 2012 | Text search only | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nick S. DhesiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Steven R. GreenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Zachary S. PodolskyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John GoodgameAkin GumpFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Seth R. MolayAkin GumpFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick S. DhesiLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Steven R. GreenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2024 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Zachary S. PodolskyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2024 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John GoodgameAkin Gump | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Seth R. MolayAkin Gump | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.74 | 1.16 | 1.23 |