Triumph Financial, Inc. TFIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1539638Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Norton Rose | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Michael G. KeeleyNorton RoseFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Michael G. KeeleyNorton Rose | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |