BlueNRGY Group Ltd CBDEF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1539042Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Dec 2015 to Jan 2017
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duane Morris | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Reed Smith | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Allen & Overy | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- F. Reid AvettWomble Bond Dickinson (US)First linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 18.55× · 95% wipeout 3.54×
- Marianne SarrazinGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 2.86× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Brad RockDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 4.64×
- Yvan-Claude PierreReed SmithFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Reid AvettWomble Bond Dickinson (US) | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 18.55 | 3.54 |
| Marianne SarrazinGoodwin Procter | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.77 | 2.86 | 1.25 |
| Brad RockDLA Piper | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 4.64 |
| Yvan-Claude PierreReed Smith | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 30 | 1.96 | 1.66 | 2.33 |