Just Energy Group Inc. JE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1538789Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2015 to Dec 2021
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Burnet Duckworth & PalmerFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2017 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Fasken Martineau | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Burnet Duckworth & Palmer | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan J. DzierniejkoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Christopher W. MorganSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan J. DzierniejkoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Christopher W. MorganSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.52 |