Oportun Financial Corp OPRT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1538716Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2018 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2018 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2018 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2018 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amanda N. UrquizaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Eric C. JensenCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda N. UrquizaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.93 |
| Eric C. JensenCooley LLP | Jul 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLP | Jul 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 1.02 |