Whiting USA Trust II
CIK 1537058Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Butler SnowFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butler Snow | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 22 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Holland & Hart | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Bracewell LLP | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Foley & Lardner | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John K. WilsonFoley & LardnerFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Thomas W. AdkinsBracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & LardnerFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John K. WilsonFoley & Lardner | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Thomas W. AdkinsBracewell LLP | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 12 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
| Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & Lardner | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 31 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 78 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.28 |