Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L.
CIK 1534814Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Reeder & SimpsonFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Reeder & Simpson | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.49 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis J. ReederReeder & SimpsonFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Gregory A. EzringPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. ReederReeder & Simpson | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Gregory A. EzringPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.07 |