PBF Energy Inc. PBF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1534504Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Apr 2026 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbert Smith | Apr 2026 | Named in a filing | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Paul Hastings | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Foley & Lardner | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Winston & Strawn | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jordan HirschHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Philip HainesHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas V. GettenPaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.89×
- Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas S. HorowitzCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
- MARTIN H. NEIDELLStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan HirschHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Philip HainesHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Douglas V. GettenPaul Hastings | Sep 2020 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.89 |
| Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin Naftalis | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Douglas S. HorowitzCahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 23 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| MARTIN H. NEIDELLStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |