Worldpay, Inc. WP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1533932Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEYFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Ulmer & BerneFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson Mullins | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 13 | 1.65 | 1.38 | 2.34 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Ulmer & Berne | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 34 | 1.22 | 0.49 | 1.18 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alex LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Richard J. SandlerDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Jeffrey A. SteinHALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Richard J. SandlerDavis Polk | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 1.45 |
| Jeffrey A. SteinHALE AND DORR | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 21 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.96 |
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.62 |
| Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |