Chiron Real Estate Inc. XRN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1533615Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Venable LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Bradley Arant Boult CummingsFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venable LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Winston & Strawn | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Bradley Arant Boult Cummings | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wayne D. BobergWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel M. LeBeyHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Ron Ben-BassatSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 3.59× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne D. BobergWinston & Strawn | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel M. LeBeyHunton & Williams | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.48 | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| Ron Ben-BassatSullivan & Worcester LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.44 | 3.59 | 0.90 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |