Isola Group Ltd.
CIK 1533349Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.13 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Robert J. RaymondCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.01 |
| Robert J. RaymondCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 24 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 |