NV5 Global, Inc. NVEE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1532961Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Jul 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Akerman LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.39 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lili TaheriLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Christina C. RussoAkerman LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- David P. LewisDLA PiperFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lili TaheriLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Christina C. RussoAkerman LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLP | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 391 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 1.22 |
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.01 |
| David P. LewisDLA Piper | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.81 |