Titan Energy, LLC TTEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1532750Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Ledgewood, PCFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- BRICKER & ECKLER LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 4.21× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Ledgewood, PC | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| BRICKER & ECKLER LLP | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 1.34 | 4.21 | 0.57 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- R. William BurnsPaul HastingsFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Jenna E. LevineWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. William BurnsPaul Hastings | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Jenna E. LevineWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 35 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.33 |