EveryWare Global, Inc. EVRY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1532543Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Jones Day | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Michael S. PiloFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Carol Anne HuffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 206 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Michael S. PiloFenwick & West LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Carol Anne HuffKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |
| Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 206 | 1.74 | 0.21 | 0.99 |