Nine Energy Service, Inc. NINE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1532286Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2018 to Dec 2025
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.First linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 27 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Justin F. HoffmanWinston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sarah K. MorganVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin F. HoffmanWinston & Strawn | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.58 |
| Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 72 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Sarah K. MorganVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.17 |