FX Alliance Inc. FX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1529979Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Fried Frank | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 540 | 1.32 | 0.24 | 0.86 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.13 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.28 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David FoxKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David FoxKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |