Azur Pharma Public Ltd Co
CIK 1529938Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- McCann FitzGeraldFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| A&L Goodbody | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| McCann FitzGerald | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jennifer Fonner DiNucciCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Suzanne Sawochka HooperCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Kenneth J. BaronskyMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Fonner DiNucciCooley LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Suzanne Sawochka HooperCooley LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Kenneth J. BaronskyMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 13 | 0.73 | 1.40 | 1.52 |