Smart Sand, Inc. SND (last ticker on record)
CIK 1529628Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Feb 2017 to Apr 2020
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan J. LynchLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Alan BeckVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Carol Anne HuffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan J. LynchLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| Alan BeckVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Carol Anne HuffKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 43 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.70 |