China Mobile Games & Entertainment Group Ltd
CIK 1528752Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Guantao Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guantao Law Firm | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.90 | 1.03 | 0.98 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- David RobertsO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Fan ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| David RobertsO Melveny & Myers LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Fan ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.84 |