Rouse Properties, LLC RSE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1528558Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Torys LLP | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 170 | 1.21 | 0.44 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott M. FreemanSidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- J. Gerard CumminsSidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 2.23× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Heather L. EmmelWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Matthew D. BlochWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott M. FreemanSidley Austin | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 18 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| J. Gerard CumminsSidley Austin | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.88 | 2.23 | 0.00 |
| Heather L. EmmelWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Matthew D. BlochWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.33 |