Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. CD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1527762Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DeHeng Law OfficesFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- B&D Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Bird & BirdFirst linked Jun 2025 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeHeng Law Offices | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| AllBright Law Offices | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
| Maples and Calder | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| B&D Law Firm | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Bird & Bird | Jun 2025 | Text search only | 46 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Huan LouSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- David C. SchwartzDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Patrick J. NaughtonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huan LouSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| David C. SchwartzDLA Piper | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |
| Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 39 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 36 | 1.16 | 0.85 | 1.41 |
| Patrick J. NaughtonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 18 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.39 |