Chart Acquisition Corp. CACG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1527349Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| DLA Piper | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard BaumannEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Lawrence R. BardMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- Lawrence T. YanowitchMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 339 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 417 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Adam MimelesEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard BaumannEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.63 | 2.06 | 1.46 |
| Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.95 | 1.58 | 0.97 |
| Lawrence R. BardMorrison & Foerster | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| Lawrence T. YanowitchMorrison & Foerster | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 339 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 417 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.02 |
| Adam MimelesEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 16 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.78 |