National CineMedia, LLC
CIK 1527190Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Bryan Cave | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey R. KesselmanSherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bryan Cave HROFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.54×
- W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey R. KesselmanSherman & Howard L.L.C. | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bryan Cave HRO | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 3.54 |
| W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.52 |