New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co., Inc.
CIK 1527032Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Rhoads & Sinon LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Thorp Reed & ArmstrongFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepper Hamilton | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Hodgson Russ | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| Rhoads & Sinon LLP | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 23 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Thorp Reed & Armstrong | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 17 | 1.10 | 0.98 | 0.48 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian M. KatzPepper HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cary S. LevinsonPepper HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian M. KatzPepper Hamilton | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Cary S. LevinsonPepper Hamilton | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.91 |