Exelis Inc. XLS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1524471Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Conner & WintersFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Conner & Winters | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arjun KoshalSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary L. SellersSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arjun KoshalSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary L. SellersSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.73 |