Pinafore Holdings B.V.
CIK 1523749Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Dykema GossettFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARERFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- LATHROP & GAGE LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Allen & Overy | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Arthur Cox | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.15 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Dykema Gossett | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
| GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARER | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 33 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| LATHROP & GAGE LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 50 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.52 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Michael G. DaileyDinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Michael G. DaileyDinsmore & Shohl | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |