Amplify Energy Holdings LLC MEMP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1521847Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Oct 2016 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2018 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Akin Gump | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2018 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2018 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2018 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Baker & Daniels | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Derek J. DostalDavis PolkFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Charles D. BybeeFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- John GoodgameAkin GumpFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Doug McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 72 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Derek J. DostalDavis Polk | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 114 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Charles D. BybeeFaegre Baker Daniels | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| John GoodgameAkin Gump | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Doug McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 11 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.22 |