Matador Resources Co MTDR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1520006Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- May 2018 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Looper Reed & McGrawFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Haynes and Boone | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Hunton & Williams | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Looper Reed & McGraw | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 10 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Winstead PC | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- M. Preston BernhiselBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Doug RayburnBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Daryl B. RobertsonBracewell LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Janice V. SharryHaynes and BooneFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- Bruce NewsomeHaynes and BooneFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Yoel KranzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Preston BernhiselBaker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.47 |
| Doug RayburnBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Daryl B. RobertsonBracewell LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Janice V. SharryHaynes and Boone | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 1.12 | 2.40 |
| Bruce NewsomeHaynes and Boone | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Yoel KranzGoodwin Procter | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 10 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.80 |