AMAYA Global Holdings Corp. GELT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1519894Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Bernard & Yam, LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 2.07× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Han KunFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllBright Law Offices | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Bernard & Yam, LLP | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 25 | 1.12 | 2.07 | 0.61 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Han Kun | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carl M. ShererRimon P.C.First linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Man YamBernard & Yam, LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steve ZhuAllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 3.66× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl M. ShererRimon P.C. | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.09 |
| Man YamBernard & Yam, LLP | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 1.14 | 0.00 |
| Steve ZhuAllBright Law Offices | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 15 | 0.62 | 3.66 | 1.85 |