Trinseo PLC TSE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1519061Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2018 to Feb 2026
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- McCann FitzGeraldFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- WongPartnership LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Loyens & LoeffFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.43×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- McInnes CooperFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| McCann FitzGerald | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Reed Smith | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| WongPartnership LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Loyens & Loeff | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 4.43 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| McInnes Cooper | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 34 | 1.14 | 0.48 | 1.14 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rachel PhillipsRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Craig E. MarcusRopes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- George A. CaseyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel PhillipsRopes & Gray | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Craig E. MarcusRopes & Gray | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| George A. CaseyShearman & Sterling | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 7 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 1.80 |