Infinity Cross Border Acquisition Corp
CIK 1518205Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Norton Rose | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 304 | 0.92 | 0.68 | 1.13 |
| Graubard Miller | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.34 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 339 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 417 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 339 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 417 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.02 |
| Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 58 | 0.95 | 1.58 | 0.97 |