Blue Wolf Mongolia Holdings Corp. MNGL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1517526Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Cane Clark LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Forbes HareFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Cane Clark LLP | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 143 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 0.97 |
| Forbes Hare | May 2013 | Text search only | 57 | 1.00 | 1.64 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 58 | 0.95 | 1.58 | 0.98 |