SOLAI Ltd SLAI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1517496Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2014 to Dec 2025
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JunZeJun Law OfficesFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Han KunFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Grandall Law FirmFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- White & CaseFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JunZeJun Law Offices | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.78 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Han Kun | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Grandall Law Firm | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 36 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| White & Case | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Paul Hastings | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard C. BlakeGunderson DettmerFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2021 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard C. BlakeGunderson Dettmer | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2021 | Text search only | 41 | 1.30 | 2.59 | 1.68 |
| Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 39 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 36 | 1.16 | 0.85 | 1.41 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |