Epicor Software Corp
CIK 1517393Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirk A. RadkeWillkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Melinda AndersonWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.10×
- Katherine A. MartinWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Lisa L. StimmellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk A. RadkeWillkie Farr | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Melinda AndersonWhite & Case | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.10 |
| Katherine A. MartinWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 12 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Lisa L. StimmellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 30 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 1.66 |